THERE ARE STILL A FEW HOT DAYS LEFT TO SUMMER where Democrats Might Like to Take Advantage of the Heat to See
if the cool, calm collected John Roberts has a pulse or anything that
might keep them from voting for him. Like what he actually thinks
after his two years on the Federal bench. The White House continues to
congratulate itself for its genius, working off the foregone conclusion
that Roberts can’t be opposed because he is less of a loud nut job than
anybody else they could have proposed. Beware the quiet, really, really
good guy. Isn’t that always the guy who goes weird in the end of scary
movies? This movie has a chance to run for thirty years. Maybe the
Democrats should act like that’s something other than a foregone
conclusion.
THE NUGGET: WHAT THIS IS REALLY ABOUT AND THE SHOCK THAT SOMEBODY ACTUALLY SAYS IT.
Of course it is more than just Roe v Wade, but the dance that takes
place around what judges actually think and how they might do their
jobs has a certain absurdity. Senators voting on judges are like
voters being told to vote for the best person, but without knowing what
that person thinks right now.
[ARLEN SPECTER/NYTIMES]In
this battle, the central issue remains Roe v. Wade, which established a
woman's right to choose. Both sides are looking for assurances that
Judge Roberts will side with them. Some senators have stated their
intention to directly ask the nominee if he would overrule Roe v. Wade.
While senators may ask any question they choose, the nominee may answer
or not as he sees fit.
OF COURSE IT MIGHT BE HELPFUL TO KNOW WHAT ROBERTS ACTUALLY THINKS BUT, WHITE HOUSE WON’T TURN OVER ROBERTS’ PAPERS Because Um They Might Tell Something about What He Actually Thinks. Because of a “right to privacy?!” [AP]
HERE’S A GOOD QUESTION [SPIN DENTIST/ALL SPIN ZONE] Gee, the Justice Department is seeking access to the medical records
of women seeking abortions, and that's likely to come up before the
Supremes, isn't it? Judge Roberts, why is your privacy more important
than that of an average woman seeking an abortion in Michigan?
TOTALLY SPUN AND EATING WHITE HOUSE COTTON CANDY Peter Baker is not a crackerjack reporter. Hush, quiet now. The reporter is repeating the PR guys pronouncements. . . .
[PETER BAKER/WAPO]
The selection presented Bush with a test: He could choose boldness or
safety. He flirted with nominating the first Hispanic justice at the
risk of alienating his base. He considered naming a woman to replace
the court's first female justice. He evaluated several passionate
conservatives in the mold of Justice Antonin Scalia. Yet in the end, he
circled back to long-standing convention, picking a white male with an
impeccable résumé, presumably conservative but not so outspoken as to
provoke an all-out fight. Rather than dismiss Senate Democrats, Bush
called their bluff and consulted with dozens of them.
"We came
to the conclusion that we could bombard them with volume," said a
senior administration official who spoke on the condition of anonymity
because the process was kept confidential. "It worked better than we
thought."
THE HERETIK CONCLUDES Regular Programming with
the hope that in the future reporters will work better than we
thought. Tune later this week for another episode of John Roberts in
The House of Wax
RECOMMENDED READING
[CORRENTE] Remember the QUESTION we asked: Is Roberts, or has Roberts ever been, a member of the Federalist Society?
And remember John Roberts's eminently parseable denial that he had "no recollection" of belonging to The Federalist Society . . . .
MORE TO FOLLOW
You're right he just might whip out a gun and slaughter the other justices in the name of Jesus and then rule that George be declared Emperor in perpetuity, all hail George Augustus Caesar and the new American Empire.
Bow down and worship at the feet of Dubya or be crucified as a HERETIC.
Posted by: Aaron | July 25, 2005 at 03:42 PM
We heretiks are very sensitive to whom the word applies, Aaron. Looking at Roberts after I finished that graphic, it occured to me he looks a bit like a slightly skewed twin of Bill Murray.
Posted by: The Heretik | July 25, 2005 at 03:50 PM
I think that should be a very skewed twin of Bill Murray, lest your characterization and caricature one day be construed as an insult to Bill. But it sounds like a good idea for a future picture.
Actually I think I'd prefer Bill Murray on the Supreme Court, we could use the comic relief. He could revise his Carl character from Caddie Shack and stuff some C4 down Antonin Scalia's gopher hole.
Posted by: Aaron | July 25, 2005 at 10:33 PM
It is possible to seriously make a superior very first impression on everybody if you are getting into a space, when you have on some truly gorgeous items of jewelry. You need to shell out near focus to those valuable strategies and use them, in order that you are going to learn the best way to decide on jewelry.
When operating with harsh chemical substances like cleaning goods, undertaking laundry, or taking a bath you need to usually eliminate your jewellery. To scrub your jewellery you should use heat drinking water by using a gentle soap, rinse it off, then polish your jewelry having a jewelry polish and dry ahead of placing it back into storage.
In terms of showing off your character as a result of jewellery, most of the time you are able to generate a much larger statement with a lot less. Choose daring, extraordinary pieces, but limit by yourself to putting on a person or two at a time. A subtle pair of chandelier earrings can set off an outfit on it is Uggs Canada
very own, and often a flashy cocktail ring is the only glitz you'll need to draw awareness.
You should not don your jewellery when you strategy on likely for just a swim or when you strategy on heading in almost every other entire body of water that could contain harsh chemicals. These kinds of points could cause your jewelry to age significantly much more easily. Secure your jewelry and be conscientious.
In case you have uggs on sale
wonderful jewelry or heirloom jewelry whose worth you want to shield via insurance policy, it can be a good idea to get outstanding pictures of those items and to have an appraisal executed by a professional. Ensure that the pictures you take are great, excellent kinds. Applying a flash when using these footage won't bring about very good images of your jewelry. It's best to capture an image of the treasured jewelry under soft, diffused fluorescent bulbs.
To add a wonderful volume of flair to any outfit basically add one particular assertion bit of jewelry. Regardless of whether it be a big ring, some bold earrings, a thick bracelet, or maybe a chunky necklace, incorporating a statement piece to any outfit won't only deliver it from the normal but will also make it a lot more 'you'. Furthermore, a press release piece is absolutely sure for making a great conversation starter in any situation.
Posted by: Praishscoca | December 13, 2011 at 01:48 AM