AGIT PROP (che) APES THE WORLD!
AGIT PROP HAS RECENTLY REVEALED HIS TRUE RELIGIOUS AFFILIATIONS:
He is some sort of quasi-agnostic deist
Since The Heretik has been condemned to be some sort of unlucky in love, I was hoping my some sort of quasi friend could help me out with getting a quasi-question to the quasi agnostic advisor in love. Here is my question:
DEAR QUASI AGNOSTIC DEIST tm:
Some days I think I am some kind of Quasi Modo TM, a genuinely politically incorrect hunchback in the straight up world of love. Do you have my back on this as it were? And why do people say as it were?
My problem is I am in love with Maureen Dowd. Look, deist or agnostic, I am not one of those late night wankers from Penistan thats jacks off my comments one at at time to Atrios. I have a life, but it is incomplete with out the mouth they call MoDo. I would never objectify a woman (or if I did I would not admit it), but there is someting about that MoDo mouth, the way the words come out of it and are left on the page. . . . *sigh* . . . I know there are tons of women bloggers, some of them even "serious."
All of these women bloggers are nice, really nice. Oy. None of them will do, at least not the way I would like to be done.
On top of all this,I realize I may have some legal problems with Maureen Dowd. With all your wisdom as as a quasi-agnostic deist, do you tnink a Quasi MoDO and and a real MoDo Can Get Along, if you know what I mean?
Any help you can offer would be appreciated. Thank you.
The Heretik
I will do you any day, Quasi MoDo, hunchback or no. And the reason people say "As it were" is because they're into subjunction, which is quasi subjective.
And I find all this quasi suggestive.
Posted by: MoDo | April 06, 2005 at 09:39 AM
Wow! Dreams really do come true, Kathy F!
Posted by: The "ButIWantToBeWithKathy"Heretik | April 06, 2005 at 09:46 AM
Thank you Heretik for showcasing my quasi-agnostic and sometimes sinister deeds. I must admit I share your mad affection for Miss Dowd. I also obtain sustenance from the blissful and sheering prose of Queen MoDo. We are doomed to the fate of a hopeless existence hanging on each and every beautiful word of the MoDo printed on the NY Times editorial page.
In the meantime I have found some beautiful audio of Ms. Dowd on NPR's Fresh Air from last year: The Goddess Speaks! Let her sweet flowing words surround your acoustic cavities in pure ecstasy…
Posted by: Agitprop | April 06, 2005 at 10:00 AM
Darn. You saw through my clever disquise. Next time I will try to be more clever.
Posted by: KathyF | April 06, 2005 at 03:42 PM
Dear Quasi,
Father I have sinned. I am in love with Tom Friedman. I know that he is married, and marriage is sacred, unless you're married to a brain dead woman, but I cannot resist his naive tongue, his learned mustache, his pretentious form of dress--oh! I must stop, and draw a line under this madness, as they say in certain countries currently deprived of the presence of Tom, who is not Dick nor Harry.
What do I do, Quasi Agnostic Deist?
Posted by: AForeignTartYou'veNeverHeardOf | April 06, 2005 at 03:54 PM
ForeignTart:
The Heretik has asked me to pass your question on to the Quasis That Be TM. A Designated Quasi will have an answer for you, probably tomorrow. Until then engage in the quasi religious ritual of your choice, but avoid rituals that involve dogs, particularly if the dog looks a lot like this Friedman fellow. Droopy jowls and droopy opinions could bring you down.
Posted by: Quasi MoDo | April 06, 2005 at 05:33 PM
You have good taste in women literati AND I think she's single, isn't she?
But what's this about legal troubles? You didn't make an unauthorized poster of her for your bedroom, did you?
Posted by: Kate S. | April 06, 2005 at 07:04 PM