HARRIET MIERS: SINGLE WHITE FEMALE
MIERS WILL BE THE LAST to know she is getting dumped. Strategies for her withdrawal are already speculated upon. Still one must ask who suffers the greatest delusion and will it only grow worse? Are Bush’s shoes so far removed from fair earth he thought Miers would fly? What rage will he suffer should she crash? And will the Miers who thought Bush the greatest governor still think him the greatest President if he abandons her by asking for her to withdraw?
DO NOT MOURN too much for Miers. If she doesn’t get what Bush wants for her even more than she wants for herself, a book she writes later on what the right did to her and how Bush left her may leave us wanting more. Single white female Miers knows where all the bodies about Bush lie. Will he and we be ready for her truth?
RECOMMENDED READING
THE RIGHT RAMPS UP [WaPo] Conservative activists intensified their opposition to the Supreme Court nomination of Harriet Miers yesterday, launching two Web sites and planning radio and television advertising aimed at forcing her withdrawal.
THE HERETIK SAYS jeez, two websites! Fitzgerald has one in PlameOut. Websites! They’re hot. Or bitching. No more bitch talk. Dems will leave that to Republicans.
SAD SAGA [Joe Gandelman/The Moderate Voice] This will be a fascinating process to watch because if Miers bites the nomination dust and GWB goes for another selection that excites and unites the GOP's base, that likely will mean more of a "red meat" conservative that could spark a Democratic filibuster, the nuclear option, etc...What will the impact be on Bush's overall approval rating? And — the biggest question — will the next candidate also be a "stealth" candidate or someone who will proudly state his/her positions?
THE HERETIK KNOWS nobody is looking forward to the coming explosions. Where will Miers watch the show from? Will she help screen her successor? Does she go back to her old job?
DID SOMEBODY SAY WEBSITES? [Wizbang] The Wall Street Journal's John Fund, who has been knocking the stuffing out of the Harriet Miers Supreme Court nomination, has started Americans for Better Justice - a political non-profit organization made up of grassroots conservatives from across the country who support President George W. Bush, but disagree with the nomination of Harriet Miers.
A coalition of conservative groups including the Center for a Just Society, Fidelis, Eagle Forum, and ConservativeHQ launched WithdrawMiers.org, a multi-pronged campaign to urge the withdrawal of Harriet Miers' nomination to the Supreme Court.
THE HERETIK SEES with websites at our fingertips, at a click of a mouse, we may now see the elephant and the donkey battle in a nuclear sunlight.
I think the Repukicans are underestimating Dubya's ego. He's already made his mind up (I believe) and H. Miers will never step down if he has anything to say about it...and we all know when Dubya's mind is made up you might as well go talk to a wall.
Posted by: robert freemyer | October 25, 2005 at 10:21 AM
State of U.S. Courts. . .
Consider the following:
Open Letter
October 23, 2005
United States Judicial Conference
Administrative Office
of the United States Courts
Thurgood Marshall Federal Judiciary Building
One Columbus Circle, N.E.
Washington D.C. 20544
Mr. Albert N. Moskowitz
United States Department of Justice
Civil Rights Division
950 Pennsylvania Ave, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20530
Mrs. Mary Beth Buchanan
U.S. Attorney Western Pennsylvania
United States Department of Justice
U.S. Post Office and Court House
700 Grant Street, Suite 4000
Pittsburgh, Pa 15219
United States Judicial Conference
Chief Justice United States Supreme Court
c/o Mr. William K. Sutter, Clerk
Office of the Clerk
c/o Mrs. Pamala Talkin
Marshall of the Court
No. 1 First Street, N.E.
Washington, DC 20543
Third Circuit Judicial Council
United States Court of Appeals
c/o Toby D. Slawsky, Esq.
Circuit Executive
22409 U.S. Courthouse
601 Market Street
Philadelphia, Pa 19106-1790
Chief Justice
United States Court of Appeals
for the Third Circuit
c/o Toby D. Slawsky, Esq.
Circuit Executive
22409 U.S. Courthouse
601 Market Street
Philadelphia, Pa 19106-1790
RE: Formal Complaint (filed under the Judicial Improvements Act of 2002
28 U.C.S. Sections 351-364); Formal Complaint (filed under 28 U.S.C.
Section 372(c)); and Request for Investigation (pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 604)
Dear All:
Please be advise of the following criminal activity.
On or about October 11, 2005, Marcia M. Waldron, Clerk for the Third Circuit Court of Appeals forwarded a copy of an Order (No. 05-3702) that, among other, requested a copy of the district court docket entries. On October 21, 2005, I purchased a copy of the docket entries (No. 03-1400) and forwarded such to the Third Circuit. However, I noticed the August 16, 2005, entry entered by JSP that advised the clerk’s office couldn’t locate documents #16, #64 and #86. That is, the clerk office wasn’t able to transmitted the complete record (No. 03-1400) to the Third Circuit.
In short, previously I submitted unequivocal evidence of perjury (violation of Section 1746 Title 28, United States Code) to the Department of Justice, federal court and others. Since my request for a formal investigation, the evidence (documents #64 and #86) was somehow removed from the official court file.
At issue is an affidavit submitted to the court by Cassandra Colchagoff (an attorney). With the November 10, 2004 affidavit Mrs. Colchagoff attempted to change her testimony (December 2003 affidavit). That is, the district court specifically cited her December 2003 testimony as its reason for dismissing the constitutional claims in the matter No. 03-1400.
Mrs. Colchagoff had testified (made a material false declaration) that there was “no link to Kaplan Higher Education Corporation (Kaplan College) and no link to federal funding.”
The district court ruled that “without a link to federal funding” I couldn’t pursue my constitutional claims against Kaplan.
The only difference between the two Colchagoff affidavits is the November 10, 2004, testimony no longer suggested, “no link to Kaplan Higher Education Corporation (Kaplan College) and no link to federal funding.” Likewise, her attorneys, Sara Shubert, Laurence Shtasel, and Blank Rome appears to have changed their representation to the court. Her attorneys now acknowledged my October 15, 2000, Kaplan College enrollment letter and admitted in footnote 2 “certain colleges operated by Kaplan Higher Education Corporation, such as Kaplan College, received federal funding.”
Because this information (Document # 64 and #86) is “fatal” to the court’s decision at No. 03-1400, it has been unlawfully removed and withheld from the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. The unexplained disappearance of document #64 and #86 is further proof of criminal activity (obstruction of justice and intentional violation of my civil rights).
Please note, the November 10, 2004, Cassandra Colchagoff affidavit (Document #64 and #86) now missing from the court record, at paragraph 23, specifically admitted malfeasance.
In conclusion, the missing affidavit (Document #64 and #86) not submitted to the Third Circuit is decisive for all factual issues related to this matter and directly contradicts Judge David S. Cercone’s Memorandum opinions (May 14, 2004 and June 29, 2005).
I demand an immediate investigation.
Respectfully,
(Name Removed)
Posted by: Insider | October 27, 2005 at 03:24 AM